The
The Construction Sector Deal indicates that around 120 million tonnes of CDEW waste is generated by construction activity every year. The new MPA report uses
The report highlights that 90% of all hard Construction and Demolition Waste (C&D) is recycled in aggregates markets, while 57% of soft Excavation Waste (EW) is used beneficially, mainly in backfilling operations to recycle land, which often follows the end of mineral extraction. This restoration work enables MPA members to deliver valuable new habitats, contributing towards national biodiversity targets.
Excluding navigational dredging spoil and hazardous waste, the MPA analysis shows that only 26mt of the total waste stream generated by the construction sector is actually sent for disposal. The report also examines some of the factors that limit or constrain the ability for more CDEW to be re-used, focussing on the soft, excavation waste.
The key findings of the report are:
• Overall recycling rate of Construction, Demolition and Excavation Waste (CDEW) – Excluding navigational dredging spoil and hazardous waste, 76% of all CDEW is currently recycled or recovered.
• Reuse rate of Construction and Demolition Waste (CD) – 90% of hard CD Waste is currently recycled or recovered.
• Reuse rate of Excavation Waste (EW) – 57% of soft Excavation Waste is recycled or recovered.
• Total Construction, Demolition and Excavation Waste (CDEW) sent for disposal - 26Mt of the remaining Construction, Demolition and Excavation waste is sent for disposal.
• Greater understanding of the Construction, Demolition and Excavation Waste (CDEW) stream is required – To better understand the recycling and recovery rates, particularly of Excavation Waste, data recording and reporting must be made more robust and consistent.
Announcing the publication of the report, MPA chief executive Nigel Jackson said: “The need for resources and waste materials to be used more efficiently and effectively has never been so strong. The mineral products sector plays an important role in contributing towards the circular economy – whether recycling concrete and brick to be reused in construction, or making use of soft excavation waste to restore old mineral sites and in turn recycle land. However, the absence of robust data relating to the generation of waste products and their subsequent use back into the ‘chain of utility’ must not be used to overshadow the performance of UK industry in recycling and recovery of waste resources. We need to understand what additional actions are needed to further reduce the 26 million tonnes of CDEW produced by the construction industry that are actually being disposed of.”
